Loading...
> >

Issue with X-Fashion Basic Sport Lingere

COBALTINFOSYSTEMSCOBALTINFOSYSTEMS Posts: 5
in Technical Help (nuts n bolts)

Not sure how I should go about reporting this, happens with any character model and no character model.

Screenshot 2024-12-21 102249.png
613 x 738 - 240K

Comments

  • felisfelis Posts: 4,464

    This set I assume: https://www.daz3d.com/x-fashion-basic-sport-lingerie-for-genesis-9-and-8-female

    What does textured wireframe look like?

    And does it happen with the base character, and/or is the character posed?

  • crosswindcrosswind Posts: 7,287

    You may try chaging Smoothing Type to Generic... if there's a Smoothing Modifier on the lingerie.

  • ElorElor Posts: 1,657

    COBALTINFOSYSTEMS said:

    Not sure how I should go about reporting this, happens with any character model and no character model.

    It seems to be visible on the main promo renders, but I don't think it's supposed to be here. Or maybe it's the spoiler, to get a better aerodynamic profile around the shoulders laugh

    On a more serious note, I would report it.

  • COBALTINFOSYSTEMSCOBALTINFOSYSTEMS Posts: 5

     no pose and any pose. here is g9 base feminine

    felis said:

    This set I assume: https://www.daz3d.com/x-fashion-basic-sport-lingerie-for-genesis-9-and-8-female

    What does textured wireframe look like?

    And does it happen with the base character, and/or is the character posed?

    Screenshot 2024-12-21 152114.png
    1180 x 1079 - 437K
  • COBALTINFOSYSTEMSCOBALTINFOSYSTEMS Posts: 5

     I do see it visible now on the promos.

    Elor said:

    COBALTINFOSYSTEMS said:

    Not sure how I should go about reporting this, happens with any character model and no character model.

    It seems to be visible on the main promo renders, but I don't think it's supposed to be here. Or maybe it's the spoiler, to get a better aerodynamic profile around the shoulders laugh

    On a more serious note, I would report it.

    Screenshot 2024-12-21 152359.png
    441 x 306 - 156K
  • COBALTINFOSYSTEMSCOBALTINFOSYSTEMS Posts: 5

     switching to generic seems to have fixed the issue for now, haven't test other than base model. I should still probably report it. It's likely unintentional.

    crosswind said:

    You may try chaging Smoothing Type to Generic... if there's a Smoothing Modifier on the lingerie.

    Screenshot 2024-12-21 153013.png
    864 x 815 - 308K
  • crosswindcrosswind Posts: 7,287
    edited December 22

    COBALTINFOSYSTEMS said:

     switching to generic seems to have fixed the issue for now, haven't test other than base model. I should still probably report it. It's likely unintentional.

    crosswind said:

    You may try chaging Smoothing Type to Generic... if there's a Smoothing Modifier on the lingerie.

    In most of such cases, the culprit is the problematic geometry on the edge. If you observe it closely, you should be able to find something wrong...

    When the collision is calculated on the mesh with Base Shape Matching as well as high value set in Smoothing Iteration, it'll collide to a  "bulge" or something like that.

    Generic type usually helps. But you still can report the issue by filling a ticket if you'd like to.

    Post edited by crosswind on
  • ElorElor Posts: 1,657

    Victoria 9 is supposed to be among the supported shape but there is no file taking care of that with her name (or the name of any of the Genesis 9 figure supported) in the readme, only FBM for a couple of Genesis 8 figures:

    http://docs.daz3d.com/doku.php/public/read_me/index/106481/file_list

    They are possibly some files missing somewhere.

  • crosswindcrosswind Posts: 7,287
    edited December 22

    Elor said:

    Victoria 9 is supposed to be among the supported shape but there is no file taking care of that with her name (or the name of any of the Genesis 9 figure supported) in the readme, only FBM for a couple of Genesis 8 figures:

    http://docs.daz3d.com/doku.php/public/read_me/index/106481/file_list

    They are possibly some files missing somewhere.

    Hmm... have you noticed that under the data folder of G9 top/bottom, there're supportive FBM files for Victoria  (as well as for others)... but just with wrong names for V8. Not sure if they work... but if they don't, that was really wrongly-defined. 

    SNAG-2024-12-22-038.png
    840 x 271 - 44K
    Post edited by crosswind on
  • COBALTINFOSYSTEMSCOBALTINFOSYSTEMS Posts: 5

    So is the manner to report things normally to file a ticket?

  • crosswindcrosswind Posts: 7,287

    Filling a ticket is usually the right way ~

  • COBALTINFOSYSTEMSCOBALTINFOSYSTEMS Posts: 5

    Okay, I will do that. Thank you all for your help and consideration.

  • ElorElor Posts: 1,657
    edited December 22

    crosswind said:

    Hmm... have you noticed that under the data folder of G9 top/bottom, there're supportive FBM files for Victoria  (as well as for others)... but just with wrong names for V8. Not sure if they work... but if they don't, that was really wrongly-defined. 

    I tested it and dialing it manually, nope, it's not a Victoria 9 morph disguised as a Victoria 8 morph laugh

    Looking at Victoria9_body_bs_Body (no idea what it means), I'm the 'author', meaning it's an auto-generated one.

    nope.jpg
    1358 x 829 - 127K
    Post edited by Elor on
  • crosswindcrosswind Posts: 7,287
    edited December 22

    You're right, haha ~ In this case, thi issue cannot be simply fixed by re-configuring the ERC link because the FBM morphs are not correct per se.

    Fill the ticket !  yes

    Yea, Victoria9_body_bs_Body is just the blended body morph of V9 coming from G9, auto generated on the Top by Auto Follow. So you're the Author.wink

    Post edited by crosswind on
Sign In or Register to comment.